Revision history [back]
Actually - if you read the "source code" of your post you will see that there is a duplicate http://
part in the second link, so there is no bug here in the "markdown" -> "html" conversion and you can edit that problem out.
But how that incorrect link got there it is another question - and it does show a possible bug in the previewer.
Actually - if you read the "source code" of your post you will see that there is a duplicate http://
part in the second link, so there is no bug here in the "markdown" -> "html" conversion and you can edit that problem out.
But conversion, but how that incorrect link got there it is another question - and it does show a possible bug in the previewer.question.