Revision history [back]
live settings about downvoting karma loss
On live settings there are two values that affect downvoting:
From what I see there, I would expect that when I downvote a user, this user loses -1 and I lose -2. However this is not true (hopefully - it's not reasonable to lose more than the bad post). In fact, when I downvote a user, he loses -2 and I lose -1 (which now make more sense).
So at the beggining I though the bug was that the captions in live settings have been put the other way round. They are not. I noticed in FAQ page, there is a reference on {{REP_LOSS_FOR_RECEIVING_DOWNVOTE}}
that returns -1, like the setting Loss for owner of post that was downvoted.
So, in my opinion there are 2 bugs (maybe minor):
- The default values are not reasonable. User that downvotes shouldn't lose more that user that has a bad post. The default values should be the other way round.
- The functionality of downvoting uses the two settings the opposite way.
To see what I mean, check this: In file /auth.py
, lines 341,354-356:
author.receive_reputation(askbot_settings.REP_LOSS_FOR_DOWNVOTING)
user.receive_reputation(askbot_settings.REP_LOSS_FOR_RECEIVING_DOWNVOTE)
It is clear that author (of the bad post) loses REP_LOSS_FOR_DOWNVOTING
and user (the one that noticed the bad post) loses REP_LOSS_FOR_RECEIVING_DOWNVOTE
. It should be the other way round, isn't it?
live settings about downvoting karma loss
On live settings there are two values that affect downvoting:
From what I see there, I would expect that when I downvote a user, this user loses -1 and I lose -2. However this is not true (hopefully - it's not reasonable to lose more than the bad post). In fact, when I downvote a user, he loses -2 and I lose -1 (which now make more sense).
So at the beggining I though the bug was that the captions in live settings have been put the other way round. They are not. I noticed in FAQ page, there is a reference on {{REP_LOSS_FOR_RECEIVING_DOWNVOTE}}
that returns -1, like the setting Loss for owner of post that was downvoted.
So, in my opinion there are 2 bugs (maybe minor):
- The default values are not reasonable. User that downvotes shouldn't lose more that user that has a bad post. The default values should be the other way round.
- The functionality of downvoting uses the two settings the opposite way.
To see what I mean, check this: In file /auth.py
, lines 341,354-356:
author.receive_reputation(askbot_settings.REP_LOSS_FOR_DOWNVOTING)
user.receive_reputation(askbot_settings.REP_LOSS_FOR_RECEIVING_DOWNVOTE)
It is clear that author (of the bad post) loses REP_LOSS_FOR_DOWNVOTING
and user (the one that noticed the bad post) loses REP_LOSS_FOR_RECEIVING_DOWNVOTE
. It should be the other way round, isn't it?